<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EMConsulting Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emcwizard.com/wp/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emcwizard.com/wp</link>
	<description>Interesting and useful EMI/EMC/E3/RFI Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:36:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Changes to MIL-STD-461: Revision E to F</title>
		<link>http://emcwizard.com/wp/?p=26</link>
		<comments>http://emcwizard.com/wp/?p=26#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emcwizard.com/wp/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the recent release of MIL-STD-461F, many military equipment suppliers are wondering what changes occurred between revision E and F and how they may be impacted by the change. Steve Ferguson of Washington Labs in Gaithersburg, MD has written an evaluation of these changes. The  Test &#38; Measurement World web site article  Military Standard Gets [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the recent release of MIL-STD-461F, many military equipment suppliers are wondering what changes occurred between revision E and F and how they may be impacted by the change. Steve Ferguson of <a href="http://www.wll.com/">Washington Labs</a> in Gaithersburg, MD has written an evaluation of these changes. The  <a href="http://www.tmworld.com">Test &amp; Measurement World</a> web site article  <a href="http://www.tmworld.com/article/CA6673310.html">Military Standard Gets a Revision</a> includes a link to Steve&#8217;s excellent white paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://emcwizard.com/wp/?feed=rss2&amp;p=26</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Easy Fix for a Common Ambient Emission Problem</title>
		<link>http://emcwizard.com/wp/?p=20</link>
		<comments>http://emcwizard.com/wp/?p=20#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emcwizard.com/wp/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When performing emissions tests within a shielded enclosure (a.k.a. screen room), a common cause of test outages is ambient RF signals. The usual (and typically acceptable) practice is to turn off the unit under test (UUT), re-measure the ambient spectrum, then compare the results between the UUT powered and unpowered tests to identify which emissions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When performing emissions tests within a shielded enclosure (a.k.a. screen room), a common cause of test outages is ambient RF signals. The usual (and typically acceptable) practice is to turn off the unit under test (UUT), re-measure the ambient spectrum, then compare the results between the UUT powered and unpowered tests to identify which emissions are contributed by the UUT and which are contributed by the ambient environment. Not only does this cause additional test time, but sometimes the results are not so easy to interpret if both the UUT and the ambient environment have emissions at the same frequencies, particularly if they are near the same amplitude. This is often the case when the UUT exercising equipment is generating the troubling ambient signal. The culprit is not always the local radio or TV station.<span id="more-20"></span></p>
<p>But wait, the UUT is in a screen room; how can an ambient signal get inside the screen room and contaminate the test results? In a properly designed and maintained screen room, it is not difficult to achieve significant isolation between the inside and outside of the room, easily on the order of 100 dB. Rarely is the screen room the guilty party. Often your nicely shielded test cables are the culprit – the ones with the shields that properly terminate about the circumference of their associated connectors. Those carefully designed shielded cables that are fished through a pass-through or “stuffing tube” in the wall of the screen room. You remember that pass-through with a length-to-diameter ratio greater than five that ensures that only insignificant amounts of RF can pass. This is the “waveguide beyond cutoff” effect. Unfortunately, you have defeated this powerful shielding technique by converting the waveguide into a coaxial cable that connects to an antenna both inside and outside the screen room.</p>
<p>For this technique to work, the waveguide/pass-through, often made of bronze, must be filled with a good dielectric, usually air. Your test cable violates this condition when it passes through the pass-through into the screen room without special consideration. The shield on your test cable becomes the center conductor of a coaxial cable whose outer conductor is the screen room pass-through. Viola, you have converted a waveguide into a coaxial cable and 2 antennas! RF energy from numerous ambient sources is easily coupled onto the that shield (antenna 1) <em><strong>outside </strong></em>the screen room, passes through this short, makeshift coaxial cable, and radiates from the shield (antenna 1) on the <em><strong>inside </strong></em>of the screen room – right into your measurement antenna.</p>
<p>Fortunately, it is easy to fix this often-overlooked problem. Just bond your test cable shield to the screen room pass-through. At the bonding point, stuff the pass-through (that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s called a &#8220;stuffing tube&#8221;) with conductive, usually copper, wool to ensure the tube is RF tight. If this test setup is used often, a more repeatable and easier-to-install arrangement would be to mount a bulkhead connector in the screen room penetration plate. Your test cables would then need appropriate connectors inside and outside the screen room – each with properly terminated shields.</p>
<p>I’ve demonstrated this effect many times to “non believers.” A simple way to do this is to set up the emissions measurement system to sweep over the FM broadcast band (88 to 108 MHz) or greater. For the first test, ensure that no conductive cables pass through any of the screen room’s pass-throughs. Take a sweep and note the “amount of quiet.” Next, fish a length of hookup wire (or about any conductor) through a pass-through tube leaving a few feet on the inside and outside of the screen room as your antennas. (The effect will be more dramatic if you support the free ends of the wires above the floor.) Take another sweep and note the amount of Led Zepplin and elevator music! This usually elicits an “aha” from observers.</p>
<p>Stu Benner<br />
E3 Design Engineer<br />
<a href="http://www.emcwizard.com/">EMConsulting, LLC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://emcwizard.com/wp/?feed=rss2&amp;p=20</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EMP Threat to America</title>
		<link>http://emcwizard.com/wp/?p=10</link>
		<comments>http://emcwizard.com/wp/?p=10#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first responders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emcwizard.com/wp/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One service I provide as an Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (EEE or E3) engineer is to help designers of military equipment and systems prevent damage to their equipment caused by Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) events. While the EMP threat is well-known in the military community, particularly its effects on strategic and battlefield forces, the potential impact on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One service I provide as an Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (EEE or E3) engineer is to help designers of military equipment and systems prevent damage to their equipment caused by Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) events. While the EMP threat is well-known in the military community, particularly its effects on strategic and battlefield forces, the potential impact on the civilian domestic infrastructure is virtually ignored.</p>
<p>Several years ago the <a href="http://www.empcommission.org/index.php" target="_blank">Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack</a>, spearheaded by my congressman <a title="Roscoe Bartlett (Maryland, 6th District, Republican)" href="http://bartlett.house.gov/Issues/Issue/?IssueID=2060" target="_blank">Roscoe Bartlett (Maryland, 6th District, Republican)</a>, issued a report about the devastating effects of a High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) event on the domestic U.S. population. A rouge state or terrorist organization could detonate a nuclear device over the U.S. and potentially blast us into the Stone Age without killing people or destroying buildings. The EMP Commission&#8217;s <a href="http://www.empcommission.org/docs/A2473-EMP_Commission-7MB.pdf">Critical National Infrastructure Report</a> (or the <a href="http://www.empcommission.org/docs/empc_exec_rpt.pdf">Executive Report</a> for those interested in an introduction or &#8216;lighter reading&#8217;) is an excellent treatise on this risk to our way of life.</p>
<p>A grass-roots organization called <a href="http://www.empactamerica.org" target="_blank">EMPACT America</a> has sprung up to bring together &#8220;local citizenry, civic-minded companies, and grassroots activists to help prepare communities in New York and across America to prepare for an EMP attack.  Working with local city governments and first responders, EMPACT America provides for coordination, education, and consulting services, helping to create a growing grassroots movement focused on EMP preparedness and recovery.&#8221; This is one of many similar groups likely to grow out of our new world disorder.</p>
<p>Stu Benner<br />
E3 Design Engineer<br />
<a href="http://www.emcwizard.com">EMConsulting, LLC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://emcwizard.com/wp/?feed=rss2&amp;p=10</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are memristors the future of Artifical Intelligence?</title>
		<link>http://emcwizard.com/wp/?p=6</link>
		<comments>http://emcwizard.com/wp/?p=6#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interesting Though Off Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emcwizard.com/wp/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/14/are-memristors-the-future-of-artifical-intelligence-darpa-think/
Be sure to read the associated articles in the links at the bottom of the page.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/14/are-memristors-the-future-of-artifical-intelligence-darpa-think/" target="_blank">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/14/are-memristors-the-future-of-artifical-intelligence-darpa-think/</a><br />
Be sure to read the associated articles in the links at the bottom of the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://emcwizard.com/wp/?feed=rss2&amp;p=6</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to Stu&#8217;s EMConsulting Blog</title>
		<link>http://emcwizard.com/wp/?p=1</link>
		<comments>http://emcwizard.com/wp/?p=1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e3 rfi emi eee emc emi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emcwizard.com/wp/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EMConsulting is an electrical engineering consulting firm that specializes in Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC).
Whether you call it interference, noise, Radio Frequency Interference (RFI), Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), Electromagnetic Interference (EMI), Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (EEE, E3, or E3), solving interference problems is not &#8220;black magic.&#8221; By considering basic laws of physics, EMConsulting can provide effective engineering solutions to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EMConsulting is an electrical engineering consulting firm that specializes in Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC).</p>
<p>Whether you call it interference, noise, Radio Frequency Interference (RFI), Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), Electromagnetic Interference (EMI), Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (EEE, E3, or E<sup>3</sup>), solving interference problems is not &#8220;black magic.&#8221; By considering basic laws of physics, EMConsulting can provide effective engineering solutions to prevent or eliminate electrical interference problems in your products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://emcwizard.com/wp/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
